We’ve examined almost 200 headphones for this information and regarded simply over 100 extra, so we are able to’t embody every little thing right here. When you have questions on a particular mannequin, please attain out to us, and we’ll be glad to share our ideas. There are a number of good headphones on this class; a number of headphones listed right here have been edged out primarily based on one of many standards we listed in our How we picked and examined part.
AKG K240 Studio: This can be a skilled mannequin with a design that dates again to the Nineteen Seventies. In our assessments it had a robust lower-treble enhance and never a lot bass, and it appeared to be voiced to spotlight the failings in a mixture in order that they’re simpler for engineers to listen to. Though it’s properly made for its under-$100 worth and has a cool retro vibe, it’s not a lot enjoyable for informal music listening.
Audeze LCD-2 Closed Again: Audeze tuned the closed-back LCD-2 to match the unique open-back model. To our ears, Audeze added too nice a high-frequency spike on this pair’s signature sound. Hello-hat, syllables, snare hits, and string noise have been particularly loud, which might be fatiguing to individuals delicate to very excessive pitches. This can be a matter of choice, although.
Audio-Technica ATH-AD900X: This pair (this model and the earlier, non-X model) has been a favourite of Brent’s for years attributable to its nice consolation, spacious sound, and inexpensive worth. Sadly, its treble-heavy, bass-light sound didn’t impress our different panelists as a lot, and Lauren and John each thought the winged headband that’s supposed to maintain the headphones from drooping didn’t do its job.
Audio-Technica ATH-M50x: Revamped to incorporate a removable cable, this cult favourite has ranked among the many prime reviewed headphones for a very long time. Nevertheless, once we in contrast it immediately with our different picks, the ATH-M50x was comparatively missing in sound and construct high quality. We discovered the excessive finish to be tizzy and buzzy, and strings and excessive notes sounded tinny. We additionally discovered the bass to be painfully woofy compared with the mids.
Audio-Technica ATH-M70x: Our panel discovered that this mannequin had much less presence within the decrease mids than we’d desire, with a considerably lispy high quality to the excessive frequencies. Consequently, the M70x headphones had an artificiality to their sound that precipitated them to lose out to different choices.
Audio-Technica ATH-MSR7: The MSR7 headphones have an additional enhance within the higher-end frequencies that, although a bit too ahead for our panel, is usually perceived as additional element. This pair additionally has an added bass enhance in an effort to steadiness out that prime finish; with sure sorts of music (hip-hop, most notably) it will possibly begin to really feel just like the bassline is somewhat too intrusive.
Audio-Technica ATH-WS1100iS: We discovered the bass enhance on this set approach too huge and loud. Kick drums sounded in-your-face however uninteresting. This pair produced an added high-end bump to attempt to rein within the lows, nevertheless it ended up being sibilant, with the “S” on lyrics sounding particularly harsh. In the event you wish to place your self subsequent to the subwoofer at a membership, these headphones are for you. If not, keep on with our picks.
Beats Professional: In our assessments, the bass was particularly ahead and so resonant that unprocessed male vocals sounded as if they’d reverb on them. It was as if somebody had mashed all of the low-frequency EQ faders all the best way up.
Beyerdynamic DT 770 Professional: Whereas half of our panel preferred the sound of this set, its lack of energy when used with an iPhone put it out of advice vary (this mannequin is meant for residence or studio use with an amplifier). For Lauren, the bass was painfully loud, and the earcups have been so massive on her small face that she discovered them uncomfortable to put on for any size of time.
Beyerdynamic DT 990 (32-ohm): This set is broadly thought to be one of many higher choices below $300, and we don’t disagree—we simply don’t assume it’s the most effective. For us, these headphones’ emphasis on the treble held them again, one thing that all of our panelists commented on. We discovered the identical to be true of the 250-ohm and 600-ohm variations, which in our opinion didn’t enhance on the sound of the usual, 32-ohm model.
Blue Lola: Nice sound, bizarre match. In our assessments, the Lola headphones had rather less sense of house than the unique Blue headphones, the Mo-Fi, however nonetheless sounded very balanced and clear. We love how they sound. Sadly, the load of the earcups makes them progressively sink decrease and decrease on the ears, they usually simply aren’t comfy for lengthy listening classes. If Blue have been to scrap the design and maintain the sound, it could presumably have a winner.
Grado SR80e: These headphones ship a lot of that massive, spacious sound we heard from the HiFiMan HE400i, our open-back advice. Many Grado headphones sound too trebly for us, however our panel thought the SR80e sounded extra balanced than many of the firm’s fashions. You continue to hear all that element and spaciousness, however you get an inexpensive quantity of groove, too. Nevertheless, for many individuals, these headphones will not be comfy sufficient for hours of listening. The set itself is fairly mild and doesn’t mash down too exhausting on the ears, however the scratchy foam Grado makes use of for its earpads does are likely to put on on the flesh after some time.
Grado SR60e: The SR80e headphones sound lots higher than this set and normally price solely $20 extra.
Grado SR125e: Our panelists thought this pair had rather less bass than the SR80e, producing a steadiness that half of our panel discovered too skinny and trebly. Though we commend the SR125e cans for his or her added spaciousness, we’d quite spend $50 much less on the SR80e.
Grado SR225e: This mannequin is just like the SR125e but even brighter sounding, which our panel didn’t get pleasure from. It makes use of the identical cupped earpads because the SR325e.
HiFiMan DEVA: This large pair of headphones comes with a removable Bluetooth dongle to rework the DEVA right into a pair of wi-fi open-backed headphones. Whereas we love the liberty of going with out a cable, we want the dongle had quantity controls along with play and pause. Additionally, the DEVA’s sound profile has a peak within the excessive frequencies that’s fatiguing, particularly when listening at average quantity.
KEF M500: We love the sound, the comfy and enticing design, and the collapsible nature of the M500 headphones. With their on-ear match, they’re nice for glasses wearers or people preferring to not have earcups that fully encompass their ears. This set was our former choose for the perfect on-ear headphones, nevertheless it’s getting more durable to seek out in inventory. In the event you desire on-ear headphones and might monitor this pair down, it’s wonderful.
Koss Pro4S: Comfy on the top, the Pro4S feels light-weight however sturdy. Sadly, the sound did not blow away our panelists. We thought the mids had a spiked, compressed sound, and we famous some depth across the 10 kHz space that made snares and cymbals really feel piercing.
Monolith by Monoprice M565: Our panelists thought that the sound of this comparatively small planar-magnetic headphone set beat out that of the costlier M1060, however everybody concluded that the sound of the M565C was clearer and extra pure.
Monolith by Monoprice M1060: This planar-magnetic mannequin intently resembles HiFiMan’s midpriced headphones and has an identical sound, however our panelists thought the M1060’s treble was unnatural, as if it have been coming from inside a can.
Monolith by Monoprice M1060C: To begin with—no exaggeration—the case for these items is the scale of a bowling bag. It’s large. These headphones are undoubtedly not made for simple portability. They’re additionally quite heavy and might slide down in the event you don’t sit completely straight. Though they sounded first rate in our assessments, with only a little bit of a reverb high quality to the low mids, they weren’t stellar sufficient to beat our picks.
Monolith by Monoprice M570: The tuning of those headphones sounds as if they conform to the Harman bass-enthusiast curve, with additional presence within the backside and prime frequencies that give the M570 a enjoyable and energetic sound. Relying in your opinion of this type of tuning, some may discuss with the lows as “mellow,” whereas purists may decide the bassline as sounding a contact bloated. They’re solidly constructed however heavy to put on. Over time, the scarf can press into your cranium and change into uncomfortable throughout longer listening classes.
Philips Fidelio X3: Bass is missing on this pair, so it seems like the inspiration is lacking in rock and hip-hop music. Consequently, highs sound overhyped and sibilant, and cymbals sound tinny. Often open-backed headphones sound extra spacious, however the lack of low frequencies makes stay music sound much less open by these headphones.
Philips SHP-9600: This pair doesn’t sound dangerous, particularly for the worth, nevertheless it isn’t a standout both. There’s a contact of blurriness within the mids, and the construct high quality feels a bit low-cost.
Shure SRH1840: This pair most likely would have emerged as considered one of our prime picks however for one problem: The design doesn’t permit the earpieces to swivel on the vertical axis, so the headphones don’t adapt nicely to some head dimensions and shapes, particularly bigger ones. In our assessments, the fronts of the earpads wouldn’t seal, which left some panelists with sound that supplied little or no bass and a too-bright treble. When these panelists pressed the earcups firmly sufficient towards their head to create a seal, the SRH1840 sounded terrific, with an virtually good steadiness of bass to midrange to treble and a splendidly spacious and ambient sound. When you have a quite small head, this mannequin is an actual contender.
Shure SRH440: These headphones had a little bit of treble sizzle that our panel discovered off-putting; Brent pinned it as being round 2 kHz. The remainder of the sonic profile appeared quite good, however that darn sibilant push, though it began off feeling like readability, ended up being fatiguing. In the event you want somewhat additional excessive finish, we recommend going with the Audio-Technica ATH-M40x, which affords extra options and a much less harsh upper-frequency bump for a similar worth.
Shure SRH840: Total, these are good studio headphones. In our assessments, the steadiness was largely flat, with somewhat additional peak within the trumpet/female-voice vary. Sadly, that peak could be a bit an excessive amount of for folk with delicate ears; all of our panelists referred to as the excessive finish a bit harsh for on a regular basis use. Though the worth (normally below $200) is on the inexpensive facet, we’d quite see your cash invested within the superior sound or options of our picks.
Shure SRH1540: Tyll Hertsens of InnerFidelity contains these $500 headphones on his Wall of Fame, however he provides that “they have a tendency to disintegrate a bit at larger volumes—bass can get bloated and free; treble can change into somewhat over-emphatic.” For $500, we wish higher than that, and we predict our readers do, too.
Sony MDR-V6: Readers requested that we examine the MDR-V6, as this mannequin appeared equivalent to the Sony MDR-7506. Seems, it wasn’t. Sure, the 2 fashions share a chassis, and the MDR-V6 is troublesome to differentiate visually from the MDR-7506 (the MDR-V6 has a crimson sticker quite than a blue one on the earcups, plus a silver-tone jack quite than a gold-plated one). Nevertheless, all of our reviewers mentioned that the MDR-V6 had much more bass and a notably peaked sonic response, and it additionally lacked the depth of sonic discipline that the MDR-7506 affords.
Sony MDR-1AM2: The design is tremendous light-weight and cozy; you could possibly simply put on these headphones all day. Sadly, our panel found that the sound had approach an excessive amount of bass and a spike within the highs round 9 kHz that was piercing and off-putting, because it overemphasized any rattle or recording flaw.
Sony MDR-7510: Wirecutter readers requested that we take a look at the MDR-7510, which had a number of nice Amazon evaluations. We discovered that the MDR-7510 had an particularly spiky, uneven excessive finish. Our total skilled panel discovered the highs to be an excessive amount of. “Sibilant, hissy, and sizzly” have been descriptors that everybody used, and the uneven excessive finish made every little thing from the mids up (guitar, strings, and horns) sound “tinny.” We additionally famous an intensely boosted, unrefined, and overbearing bass, which gave the MDR-7510’s sound a “growth and sizzle” high quality. Apparently, due to the rectangular, oval form of the earcups, they may sit larger or decrease in your ears relying on the scale of your head, which may alter the sound. However in our opinion, no quantity of repositioning made this Sony mannequin really sound good.
Sony MDR-7520: A reader-requested mannequin, these skilled headphones seem like the large sibling of the MDR-7506. We love that the MDR-7520 has a detachable cable, and in our assessments this pair sounded as if it had higher-quality drivers, however sadly they weren’t tuned as evenly as these on the MDR-7506. The bass was very ahead and had a bloated high quality, and the highs might be piercing. It’s a bummer—a number of tweaks to the tuning, and these headphones may be a favourite.
V-Moda Crossfade M-100: The sturdy design is so nicely constructed that you simply’re prone to have a troublesome time noticing the rest. However Tyll Hertsens of InnerFidelity writes, “I’d have most well-liked the bass enhance to occur about 100Hz decrease” and notes that he discovered the midrange to be missing.
V-Moda Crossfade M-100 Grasp: Like all V-Moda headphones, the customizable and durable construct is a giant a part of the attraction. The audio-splitter cable is a pleasant bonus, too. Whereas the tuning on this pair is totally acceptable for informal listening, the considerably recessed mids and jagged highs aren’t perfect for somebody on the lookout for a pair to watch or combine recordings. The additional peak within the high-highs (to our ears, it was round 8 kHz and 11 kHz) provides a metallic sheen to breath sounds. One other bump someplace within the space of three kHz may give vocals a mildly shouty high quality and brass devices a imprecise harshness. The match could be very comfy for most folk because of the tremendous delicate memory-foam-like padding on the scarf and earcups, however people with bigger ears or ears that stick out could discover that the small, shallow earcups really feel cosy.
V-Moda XS: This pair is constructed like a tank—sturdy, nicely crafted, and customizable. However the sound had some colorations, with a boosted bass, some ups and downs within the mids, and a rolled-off treble; it wasn’t pure, nevertheless it wasn’t objectionable, both. On prime of that, the clamping drive can actually trigger your ears to ache once you’re listening over lengthy intervals, particularly in the event you don’t have a small cranium. In the event you just like the sound of V-Moda headphones, you’ll just like the XS’s sound; it’s the tight match that bumped this pair off our checklist of prime choices.
Be the first to leave a review.