We’ve examined greater than 125 earbuds for this information, so we will’t checklist our ideas on each one right here. Nevertheless, if you’re on the lookout for data on a particular mannequin we haven’t talked about, be at liberty to contact us.
1More Twin Driver: John was the one certainly one of our panelists who loved the Twin Driver earbuds. Brent couldn’t get a superb seal, and Geoff and I each discovered the excessive frequencies to be too harsh and the mids to be recessed. Nevertheless, John talked about that he thought the earbuds may fall out of his ear, so maybe match affected the sound high quality for him as properly.
1More Triple Driver: This mannequin is boosted in each the bass and the upper-treble frequency areas, so on digital music, hip-hop, and equally combined songs, our panel thought the sound may get a bit overpowering on the underside and sibilant on the highest. Songs with already-forward low bass notes may sound so loud that they’d overpower a few of the guitar strums. Equally, the consonants on vocals appeared a bit unnaturally ahead.
1More Quad Driver: The mids and highs have been good, however the bloated, muddy bass smeared acoustic-guitar sound, and male vocals have been buried.
AKG N20U: If we had to make use of one phrase to explain the N20U, it will be “nearly.” Brent, Geoff, and I principally appreciated the sound, which consisted of a barely boosted bass, even mids, and principally nice highs. What went fallacious? One part of the highs had a jabbing sibilant high quality that ruined what may in any other case have been a great-sounding set of headphones. Additionally, the earbud form felt unstable in a number of panelists’ ears.
Beats urBeats3: The match on these earbuds was stable for us, and the semi-firm wings are a fantastic stability function. You possibly can inform these headphones are made with high quality drivers, however in our assessments the tuning had an excessive amount of of a bump within the highs and lows. The reverby bass made Kanye sound as if he have been performing in a swimming pool, and we disliked the in-your-face highs.
Beyerdynamic iDX 160 iE: Beyerdynamic is normally recognized for a crisp excessive finish. This pair, nonetheless, appeared extra mid-forward; in consequence, guitars overpowered vocals, and all the sound ended up sort of muddy. The bass, maybe as a result of there have been no highs to comprise it, sounded bloated and formless. Total we have been underwhelmed.
Beyerdynamic iDX 200 iE: As compared with our picks, these earbuds had a two-dimensional high quality, missing dynamic vary. Moreover, a bass peak dulled the mids, and the highs have been a contact sibilant. Respectable, however not fairly as balanced because the earbuds we selected.
Beyerdynamic Soul Byrd: This pair isn’t particularly isolating, which can clarify why the corporate selected to spice up the bass frequencies. In our assessments, nonetheless, the bloat on the low finish was noticeable even on acoustic guitar. Plus, the highs have been a contact jagged, which made every thing sound much less detailed than we choose.
Brainwavz B150: This pair induced some match points for our panel, which in flip affected the best way we skilled the sound. A part of the panel couldn’t get the ear tip into their ear canal deeply sufficient to seal, because of the form of the plastic housing. For these people, the bass was missing. Different panelists discovered that the excessive notes didn’t sound as delicate and clear as they’d like.
Brainwavz B200: These earbuds had intensely, painfully, piercingly sibilant excessive frequencies.
Brainwavz S3: Brent and I each had points getting a seal with the S3, even utilizing the most important suggestions—we may get one aspect to seal properly, however the different we needed to maintain in place. If we let go of the cable, the burden of the steel chassis would pull the earbuds out of our ears. Match apart, all of our panelists discovered that the S3 had a thin-sounding vocal vary, and the lows have been too rounded off. It made stringed devices (guitar included) lack richness and depth. The S3 wasn’t horrible, nevertheless it was flawed sufficient for us to maintain it off our checklist of prime picks.
Brainwavz S5: The S5 had an intense high-end peak, each at 3 kHz and someplace round 6 kHz, that might be fatiguing to people who’re delicate to greater frequencies. This pair additionally emphasizes any flaws in recording, so when you’re listening to one thing with a tape hiss (as some older, pre-remastered recordings from earlier than 1980 have), you’ll discover it much more. These headphones simply weren’t fairly ok to beat out our prime selections.
Denon AH-C720: A lot reverby bass. The highs have been fairly peaked, and that was the one cause the vocals didn’t get utterly misplaced. We detected an icy sibilance to the highs that induced inhalations of vocalists to have a metallic high quality. These earbuds supply sufficient separation within the mids and lows that you could distinguish guitar from bass, however to us the outcomes sounded as if each devices have been taking part in in an echo chamber.
Echobox Finder X1: These headphones have a number of filters that alter the sound, however none of them was a house run for our panel. We discovered the “balanced” filter to be blurry within the lows, and the bass-forward filter produced means an excessive amount of bass. The third filter made the highs sound brilliant and coarse.
Etymotic ER2XR: The “XR” within the title stands for “prolonged response.” Etymotic is thought for sound profiles that typically lack bass depth, however the ER2XR is designed to ship extra bass. Though these earbuds do have extra bass than earlier fashions, it was nonetheless noticeably decrease within the combine throughout our assessments. We discovered ourselves wanting to show the quantity as much as higher hear a bass guitar and the decrease notes of a piano. However after we did, the vocals and snare hits grew to become so loud as to be uncomfortable.
Etymotic ER3SE: The highs and mids have been beautiful, however songs the place the bass ought to have been current have been lacking oomph. Even after we messed with an equalizer and tried to show up the bass, the end result sounded as if somebody had forgotten to plug within the subwoofer.
Remaining E3000: Our panel fairly appreciated these earbuds however discovered that the bass was just a bit too heavy and blurry, and it tended to cowl the recessed mids.
Remaining F3100: This pair had a loud cable and nonexistent lows that emphasised consonants and recording flaws.
Flare Audio Flares Jet: The excessive frequencies had an excessive amount of of a noticeable peak to sound pure, and the bass enhance was a bit too broad, so low notes may blur male vocals. Moreover, the cable transferred a noticeable quantity of noise.
Grado iGi: The iGi comes with quite a lot of unusually formed suggestions, but Brent and I couldn’t get a seal with any of them. Our panel agreed that the excessive frequencies weren’t solely too intense but additionally too harsh and sibilant. On this pair, “s” sounds particularly pierced. Though the mids and lows have been beautiful, the big spike within the consonant vary was far too fatiguing for us to have the ability to take heed to this set for lengthy durations.
Klipsch R6i: These earbuds have a tip form that’s particular to the Klipsch model. It by no means match Brent, and none of the remainder of us on the panel have been pleased with the match, so we didn’t suppose we may consider the sound correctly.
Klipsch X6i: The lows sounded a bit boring and blurry, and the highs have been sort of shushing to our panel’s ears. The most important subject was that none of our panelists felt like that they had a safe seal.
Marshall Mode EQ: The Mode EQ has a bit change on the aspect of the distant that toggles between what Marshall describes as a “heat sound” and a “brighter sound.” Though our panel didn’t dislike the Mode EQ, we didn’t like both possibility greater than the sound of the usual Mode earbuds. We thought the low frequencies have been a bit overstated on the “heat” setting and the highs a bit jagged on the “brilliant” setting. Total, we discovered the usual Mode to be our favourite of the Marshall in-ear fashions.
Massdrop x NuForce EDC: The lows on these earbuds sounded fairly good, however we heard a spike within the highs that made excessive notes sizzly, sibilant, and piercing after we turned the quantity up.
Massdrop x NuForce EDC3: Our panel discovered the bass to be thudding and one-note, and the highs uneven in a means that sounded unnatural. Snaps on a snare drum’s edge appeared like “thap!” slightly than “clack.”
Grasp & Dynamic ME05: The highs on the ME05 had an icy edge, and panelists agreed that this pair had a bit an excessive amount of bass for our tastes. We didn’t dislike it by any means, however we appreciated different headphones higher.
MEE Audio M6 Professional 2nd Technology: We appreciated the sweat resistance of this pair however discovered the highs and lows pushed ahead in a means that sounded unnatural. Though that impact could also be useful for somebody on stage who wants vocals and the beat to be probably the most clear after they’re performing, we didn’t like it for passive music enjoyment.
MEE Audio Pinnacle P1: Oh expensive. These earbuds have been a sizzly, piercing mess. The excessive highs have been so peaked. Have you ever ever moved the definition slider on a photo-editing program all the best way up, to the purpose the place it appears to be like like there’s a darkish define on every thing? That’s how unnatural this pair sounded.
MEE Audio Pinnacle P2: Nobody on our panel was capable of get a snug match with these earbuds, regardless of their being designed to be worn with the cable both threaded over the ear or hanging down. In our assessments, “s” sounds have been overemphasized, and the bass was mildly muffled.
Meze Audio Rai Solo: This pair feels properly made, it’s snug to put on, and we love that it comes with a whole lot of suggestions. Nevertheless, in our assessments the decrease highs have been a bit ahead, so the general sound within the higher frequency vary wasn’t as clear and glowing as we’d like to listen to. Moreover, one thing within the low mids appeared muffled, which lent the sound a veiled high quality and an absence of depth in contrast with the outcomes from different earbuds we like on this worth vary.
Monoprice HR-3: These earbuds sounded inauthentic, with icy highs and booming bass.
Monoprice MP80: This pair has filters that modify the sound, however we didn’t look after any of them. The “balanced” filter utilized a piercing and tinny high quality to the highs whereas leaving the bass unfocused and seeming to haven’t any pitch. The “voice ahead” filter made vocals sound as in the event that they have been in a tin can. As for the bass-boost filter, the bass on songs that already had a whole lot of bass grew to become so loud and reverby that the one different factor we may hear apart from the bass was consonants.
Monoprice Monolith M300: We weren’t followers of those earphones. The highs sounded weirdly boring, and the lows got here throughout as blurry and muddy, as if every thing have been below a moist blanket. The match was uncomfortable and tended to shift rather a lot within the ear canal, each of which additionally affected the sound high quality.
Monoprice Quintet Wired In Ear Monitor: We actually appreciated that this pair has a removable and replaceable cable with a single-button distant and mic for below $100. However our panel was divided on the sound high quality. With excessive frequencies, Lauren thought the slim high-end spike was sufficient so as to add ample element, however John felt as if these didn’t ship the crispness he wished to listen to. All of us agreed that the bass was too ahead within the combine: Whereas it didn’t blur male vocals, it did make them sound like they have been recessed. In the event you’re a bass fan, you may like these, however audio purists in all probability will need to cross.
NAD Viso HP20: These earbuds are first rate. They’re not strictly impartial—in our assessments, the lows may sound as if that they had a contact of additional reverb, which added some spaciousness. Sadly, the earbuds’ bullet-shaped chassis compelled two of our panelists to push the ideas fairly far into their ear canals to get a correct seal, and these earbuds additionally lacked the general element of our prime picks.
Optoma NuForce HEM Dynamic: These earbuds sounded veiled, with blurry bass and muffled highs.
Optoma NuForce HEM2: This set reproduced mids and lows properly however had a spike on the highs that affected “s” sounds on consonants. This impact might be fatiguing for folk who’re delicate to excessive frequencies.
Phiaton MS 100 BA: Reasonably priced and sporting a single-button distant, the MS 100 BA would have been a choose if it weren’t for the sibilant highs. Everybody on the panel observed them and located them fatiguing. It produces a slight dip within the male vocal vary too, so when you flip up the quantity on a person singing, “s” sounds actually pierce. A near-miss.
Pioneer SE-CH5T: This pair sounded finest with Comply foam suggestions, however even then, bloated lows muffled electrical guitar and the decrease half of the piano vary, and the highs had a considerably sibilant high quality. After we used the silicone suggestions, the failings have been magnified, with a fair boomier bass and lispy syllables on consonants.
Polk Audio Nue Period: We discovered the frequency response on these earbuds to be uneven. In the event you take heed to music that’s sonically dense (suppose Phil Spector’s Wall of Sound), you may hear dips and valleys that weren’t within the recordings.
RBH EP2: A former choose. The slight bass bump and dynamic sound nonetheless make it a top quality pair of headphones. However progress occurs, and after we in contrast the EP2 in opposition to our winners, we discovered that it lacked the flat, even sound and additional element within the highs that we may hear from the very best within the class.
RHA T20i: Though the T20i has a number of filters, our panel wasn’t impressed with any of them. All of them bestowed a top quality to the highs that made vocals sound lispy, and recessed mids made guitars sound as in the event that they have been farther away than the remainder of the music.
Shure Aonic 4: We had excessive hopes for this set of in-ear screens, however discovered that the sound high quality lacked the sparking highs and depth of area we’ve come to count on from equally priced opponents. The lows felt boring, formless, and lacking a way of house. We additionally weren’t followers of the upper-mid-frequency spike that sounded to be within the vary between 3 kHz and 5 kHz vary, and a high-frequency bump round 10 kHz that added an excessive amount of snap to snares and an excessive amount of sibilance to vocals. The Aonic 4 isn’t a foul pair of headphones, however on the unique asking worth of $300, we anticipated extra.
V-Moda Forza Metallo: This set wasn’t a favourite for our panel. Uninteresting, lifeless bass and coarse-sounding highs made music sound unbalanced and overly hyped.
V-Moda Zn: The cable has a heavy ornamental widget that tugs on the earbuds while you stroll, so that they really feel as if they may fall out of your ears. In our assessments, though feminine vocals and strings sounded clear and detailed, we heard a excessive peak on “t” and “s” sounds that was piercing. Moreover the bass had a reverby high quality that induced basslines to lose readability.
Yamaha EPH-M100: Unrefined lows produced an absence of depth and dimension on the M100. Voices sounded skinny and unsupported, and the higher mids have been harsh.
Yamaha EPH-M200: Ideally, your headphones ought to be even-sounding throughout all frequency ranges, a flat line from bass to treble. In distinction, the M200 created a craggy mountain vary of peaks and valleys. The mid frequencies have been recessed, and the lows and highs had a couple of spikes that made bass devices sound blobby. Voices sounded concurrently muffled within the vocal vary but scorching on the consonants.
Be the first to leave a review.