The Greatest Ultrawide Displays for 2020

The Acer XR342CK bmijqphuzx ultrawide monitor on a desk.
Picture: Rozette Rago

Our decide

Acer XR342CK Pbmiiqphuzx

The Acer XR342CK is probably the most correct 34-inch ultrawide, with a pixel depend excessive sufficient to interchange two screens. Its 100 Hz refresh price and FreeSync compatibility additionally make it a fantastic selection for gaming.

With its 3440×1440, color-accurate, 34-inch IPS display, the Acer XR342CK Pbmiiqphuzx is the very best ultrawide monitor. It often prices lower than $700, the stand lifts, tilts, and swivels, and it has loads of ports, together with a USB-C port. However you’ll should cope with Acer’s lackluster guarantee, which doesn’t cowl widespread issues like lifeless pixels, in addition to a poorly designed on-screen show that makes it simple to press the fallacious button.

The Acer XR342CK monitor’s panel has an overclocked 100 Hz refresh price, sooner than the Dell U3419W show’s 60 Hz. This isn’t very noticeable for desktop use, however you’ll be able to see a distinction in video video games. Not like the Dell, the Acer has FreeSync assist, which makes it a implausible possibility in case you play video games. We examined the XR342CK with each an AMD graphics card and a Nvidia graphics card, and FreeSync labored in each circumstances with out challenge. FreeSync’s low frame-rate compensation turned on as anticipated in graphics-intensive titles like Shadow of the Tomb Raider, whereas the adaptive sync labored effective in increased frame-rate titles like Overwatch. This makes it one of the vital reasonably priced, finest choices for gaming in addition to fundamental productiveness. The XR342CK additionally has an HDR compatibility mode, however in our assessments the mode did not make HDR-compatible content material look any higher and often made all the things look worse.

This chart reveals the Acer XR342CK’s grayscale accuracy throughout a spectrum of blacks and whites. The bulk had been beneath a DeltaE 2000 worth of two.0, which may be very correct.

The XR342CK’s distinction ratio was 851:1, the second closest to our goal of 1000:1 of any ultrawide we examined. The U3419W got here in at 947:1, however we didn’t discover a distinction between the 2 after we positioned them subsequent to one another. A poor distinction ratio is most noticeable once you’re watching darkish scenes in motion pictures, and the Acer and Dell screens each carried out admirably (besides within the corners, the place ultrawides exhibit higher-than-usual quantities of backlight bleed).

We examined shade high quality by analyzing DeltaE 2000 values, which point out how distant a displayed shade is from what the colour must be. A price beneath 1.0 is sort of excellent, whereas beneath 2.0 is adequate for print-production work; round 3.0, you start to see a distinction between the display and a reference photograph.

In our assessments, many of the Acer XR342CK’s colours had been correct to a DeltaE 2000 worth round 2.0, so that they’ll look color-accurate to the bare eye. However some oranges and reds peaked, which implies these colours could look much less correct.

The XR342CK had a gamma of three.4979, a better outcome than we wish to see; it may trigger some shadows to seem too darkish. The Dell U3419W carried out higher than the Acer XR342CK with a price of two.3464, although the distinction gained’t matter to most individuals. The LG 34UC88-B was noticeably darker with much less pop within the colours.

As for grayscale shade error, the XR342CK’s common DeltaE 2000 worth was 1.3237, which is great. This rating—the very best of any ultrawide monitor we examined—implies that its colours are impartial, missing a blue, inexperienced, or purple tint. Colours don’t seem washed out, and there’s not a lot of a distinction between brighter highlights. The Dell’s DeltaE 2000 worth was increased at 2.6654, however something decrease than 3.0 continues to be completely effective for most individuals.

On our ColorChecker take a look at, which assesses values via greater than 100 colours, the XR342CK had a median DeltaE 2000 worth of 1.8035, similar to the Dell’s worth of 1.7552. It had some purple and orange peaks, which implies that photographs with numerous purple and orange tones could look much less correct than others, however that impact wasn’t noticeable after we used the monitor. It covers 99.19 % of the sRGB shade gamut, just like what we noticed on the Dell.

The Acer XR342CK often sells for beneath $700, about the identical worth because the Dell U3419W, however round $150 greater than the LG 34UC88-B. The Acer’s improved colours, adjustability, and wider number of ports make it value the additional cash over the LG, and its shade accuracy and USB-C port make it higher for most individuals than the Dell.

A GIF of the Acer XR342CK bmijqphuzx ultrawide monitor being adjusted to many different positions.
The Acer is adjustable sufficient that you simply gained’t have an issue dialing in ergonomic place. Video: Rozette Rago

You possibly can alter the peak of the Acer XR342CK up and down inside a 5-inch vary, tilt it ahead and backward, and swivel it left and proper. The Dell U3419W presents the identical changes, however the vertical vary is a half inch much less. The Acer’s quasi-futuristic three-point stand provides to the general depth of the monitor, so that you’ll want a deep desk to suit it comfortably. The Dell’s stand, in distinction, is way smaller, so you’ll be able to push that monitor farther again on a desk. Each screens have an space to route cables via the stand, and Acer features a panel to cowl up the inputs on the again in case you can’t deal with the concept of ports being doubtlessly seen to passersby. The XR342CK is VESA suitable if you wish to join it to a mount or monitor arm; Acer additionally features a wall-mounting bracket it you don’t need to cope with the stand in any respect. On the again of the monitor you’ll be able to set up an non-compulsory headset hook, which provides your headphones a everlasting place to stay once you aren’t utilizing them.

  • A look at the Acer XR342CK bmijqphuzx ultrawide monitor's three-point stand base.

    The three-point stand takes up lots of area however prevents the large monitor from wobbling. Picture: Rozette Rago

  • A look at the back of the Acer XR342CK bmijqphuzx ultrawide monitor, which features a stand with a pair of headphones.

    An non-compulsory headphone stand on the again might help hold your desk organized. Picture: Rozette Rago

  • A look at the Acer XR342CK bmijqphuzx's ports, which includes a USB-C port among more standard ones.

    Many of the ports on the XR342CK are normal for ultrawide screens, however the USB-C port is very helpful for house owners of a MacBook Professional or different ultrabook that fees by way of USB-C. Picture: Rozette Rago

The XR342CK contains many of the ports you want on the again, dealing with down, together with two HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.2A, and a DisplayPort output if you wish to join it to a different monitor. On the rear are 4 back-facing USB ports for connecting USB units, corresponding to a keyboard, mouse, or storage gadget. With the USB Sort-C port you’ll be able to join a laptop computer (corresponding to a MacBook Professional or Dell XPS 13) to the show with one cable that may additionally cost the laptop computer. The USB-C port outputs 60 W of energy and in addition connects the pc to the XR342CK’s USB hub. The XR342CK doesn’t have a USB-A upstream port, so in case your pc lacks a USB-C port you’ll want a USB-A–to–USB-C cable. Acer contains an HDMI cable, a DisplayPort cable, and a USB-C cable within the field.

The XR342CK has some oddball options that most individuals will need to flip off, corresponding to a color-changing ambient gentle beneath the show; though you’ll be able to choose the colour, the novelty wears off rapidly. The XR342CK additionally has built-in audio system, however we discovered them too heavy within the bass with skinny highs. They’re insufficient for listening to music or watching TV reveals or motion pictures, however they’re effective for system sounds or the occasional YouTube video.

Source link

Leave your vote

{{ reviewsOverall }} / 5 Users (0 votes)
Audience Quality0
Hookup Chance0
Privacy and Security0
What people say... Leave your rating
Order by:

Be the first to leave a review.

User AvatarUser Avatar
{{{ review.rating_title }}}
{{{review.rating_comment | nl2br}}}

This review has no replies yet.

Show more
Show more
{{ pageNumber+1 }}
Leave your rating

Your browser does not support images upload. Please choose a modern one



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.